-
[HUB] 30 Game Benchmark, Radeon RX 5600 XT vs. GeForce RTX 2060 Super [2021 Edition]
-
These are the reviews the comment sections want to see.
-
5600XT actually was 280$ GPU? I remember that everyone hate it and prefer 5700.
ID: h836gfcID: h838f8vAh, yes, cheap 5700s. Good time. My friend bought one and I decided to wait for RDNA2 with ray-tracing. Good for him
-
I think I'd still rather pay the premium for the 2060 Super considering it has 2GB more VRAM and fully supports DX12U. DLSS, NVENC and RTX Voice are also really useful features. The whole RDNA1 lineup is pretty compromised compared to RDNA2 when you consider we're entering a brand new generation of consoles and none of the 5XXX cards support the latest standards. I tend to keep my GPUs for a while anyway so I'd want to make sure I'm not locked out of cool SSD and raytracing stuff in the future.
ID: h82gtgoPrice wise the competitor was the 1660Ti, or the non Super 2060 if you found an amazing deal. The 2060 Super is just under 50% more expensive than the 5600xt in terms of MSRP. The question is, let's say your budget is $1000, would it be worth substantially downgrading CPU/RAM/storage etc for the upgrade. In many cases, it won't be.
ID: h833whs2GB more VRAM and fully supports
HuB usually makes a big deal about how important more RAM is, except in this case for some reason.
ID: h834i2sBecause the 5600 XT is 40% cheaper.
ID: h83ykfpIt's because we're elite mathematicians and as such can calculate that 8 to 16 is a 100% increase, but 6 to 8 is only a 33% increase. (The bigger the percentage the more significant the difference, in this instance we're talking about a factor of 3)
-
Timestamps: 04:26 - Test Setup 04:56 - Assassin's Creed Valhalla 05:38 - Call of Duty Modern Warfare 06:12 - Biomutant 06:49 - Outriders 07:07 - Horizon Zero Dawn 07:23 - Shadow of the Tomb Raider 07:52 - DOOM Eternal 08:57 - Death Stranding 09:17 - Dirt 5 09:44 - Watch Dogs: Legion 10:16 - Resident Evil Village 10:33 - Cyberpunk 2077 10:54 - 1080p Performance 11:30 - 1440p Performance 11:46 - 4K Performance 12:11 - Final Thoughts
-
Man, some fanboys here are really butthurt. Grow up ffs
-
I love HUB and and believe them to be as unbiased as a channel can be. But i couldnt help notice this lately, yet once again many AMD sponsored titles that he always includes run really bad on nvidia cards but the ones with nvidia branding (watch dogs, cyberpunk) run almost as good on amd.
Whats the Criteria for adding new games and removing some for this testing ?
Where is control, Jedi fallen order, The outer worlds, Wolfenstein Youngblood ? didnt he test with those before ?
ID: h81w2vxyet once again many AMD sponsored titles that he always includes run really bad on nvidia cards
Basically just AC Valhalla. The latest AC game is always one of the mainstays of basically any big GPU review test, for good reason.
Where is control, Jedi fallen order, The outer worlds, Wolfenstein Youngblood ? didnt he test with those before ?
There's a LOT of games that can be tested. Some will always end up being left off.
ID: h81y28gBasically just AC Valhalla
RE Village, Borderlands 3, Dirt 5 are all amd sponsored titles that also run bad on nvidia. then you have Forza, Hitman, Death stranding, Days gone, Horizon zero dawn all favour AMD.
the included Nvidia Titles run at less than 10% Advantage for Nvidia as opposed to 20%+ for AMD.
(Need i remind you that Doom eternal is one of the few games that doesnt particularly favour a side and its literally the one at bottom chart here meaning basiclly no titles with real Nvidia advantage were included. here is the HUB 3070 vs 6700xt for Reference )
There's a LOT of games that can be tested. Some will always end up being left off
This is what im talking about. Whats the Criteria ? should there not be a balance ?
How do you know if the improvment on the side of the 5600xt came from actual gains rather than the difference in Games tested between then and now ?
ID: h81obaxMy question is where are any Race sims titles? It gets bigger and bigger every year but there is nothing from GN or HU. There is not even a test where they try out how a system perform in a triple screen setup or VR, say HP reverb g2 in a race sim title.
GN and HU are simply covering what avg joe usually would play but even avg joes nowadays would play more than fps or hack and slash titles these days.
ID: h81vxhqHU regularly benchmark the F1 games.
They also choose games that have easily repeatable sections to make it easier for benchmarking.
And hardcore sims are obviously very niche - multimonitor setups even moreso.
-
I believe a fairer competitor for the 5600 XT would be the vanilla 2060. Nevertheless, it is an interesting comparison, and particularly relevant to remind us which GPU tier the 6600 XT has the burden to replace.
-
[removed]
ID: h83l58pYour comment has been removed, likely because it contains uncivil language, such as insults, racist and other derogatory remarks.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
-
That's a real interesting comparison, but the extra VRAM of the 2060 Super and DX12U support I think will make it a better value in the long run.
That said, I didn't the 5600XT was anywhere near that fast of a card, it's really a solid 1080p option.
-
they get about 80fps less than what my 2060s(slight oc) with 3700x with 3600-3800mhz ram with tuned timings(crucial rev e) in doom eternal at 1080p.
Sure it is probably not the same scene but if it is the scene they show of they should be getting more than my test scene where it was out in the open.
would be nice if they still showed of 3dmark firestrike/timespy results as well so that we can compare in detail.
GN and HU are not that good at optimising their systems as they are barley faster than oem prebuilt systems.
ID: h81qdm5In the case of this video it's more important if they test the same scene for both cards, not if they get the same results as you in some other part of the game.
ID: h81s987yeah but not having an optimised system may affect the the end result of the comparison. For instance vega cards were super crappy with slow or unoptimized systems but when the system was at the max the vega card would easily outperform nvidia comparable nvidia gpus when the system was "mint".
even though both gpus would naturally take advantage of a much faster system we would for sure see a different result here and there compared to what we see now.
ID: h81mbqfthey get about 80fps less than what my 2060s(slight oc) with 3700x with 3600-3800mhz ram with tuned timings(crucial rev e) in doom eternal at 1080p.
Is it single or dual rank? Steve is using a dual rank 32GB DDR4-3200 CL14 kit.
Sure it is probably not the same scene but if it is the scene they show of they should be getting more than my test scene where it was out in the open.
The fact that they are getting less fps shows that they chose a more GPU intensive place to test making it better for GPU testing.
Who cares if you get a lot of fps in one place when your fps drops by a significant margin when viewing a GPU intensive scene.
GN and HU are not that good at optimising their systems as they are barley faster than oem prebuilt systems.
You probably haven't see GN's prebuild benchmarks then.
ID: h81mhd0No, they are not testing at a more gpu intensive area, an open area where you can see further is much more taxing.
If their test area is in an enclosed small space like they show then it is not taxing at all.
my lowest fps numbers is 220 in doom eternal.
And again, yeah we cant compare it straight on like I do here, but it seems they test it at a lower taxing area and with a very unoptimized system. Heck I never oc my cpus but simply oc the gpu and system memory only.
edit: from what I seen they use 4 8GB sr sticks from what I seen.
while I used at the time 3200cl16 micron rev e 2x16 DR kit at 3600-3800 depending on what I wanted to tinker with on a mini itx sys.
ID: h81w6ivwould be nice if they still showed of 3dmark firestrike/timespy results as well so that we can compare in detail.
Artificial benchmarks only tell us how these GPU's run in those artificial benchmarks. It's not useful information for gamers unless there's literally no other results available.
ID: h81wyg8it is super useful to compare where the components slot in, the best way is to look at the fps numbers, the 3d scores to me are useless.
-
[deleted]
ID: h82lfk1To see how the cards hold up performance wise after 2 years. Its mostly a hindsight thing but it can be useful to know if certain GPUs are holding up to the test of time or not.
引用元:https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/ozr8vx/hub_30_game_benchmark_radeon_rx_5600_xt_vs/
because at the time you could buy a 5700 for 300 or so which gives you more VRAM and the possibility of flashing a 5700XT bios for even more performance.