Dying Light 2 Stay Human: PS5 vs Xbox Series X/S Comparison – 30FPS/60FPS/RT Modes Tested!

1 : Anonymous2022/02/02 17:17 ID: siu4wr
Dying Light 2 Stay Human: PS5 vs Xbox Series X/S Comparison - 30FPS/60FPS/RT Modes Tested!
2 : Anonymous2022/02/02 18:21 ID: hvb3cff

60fps 1080p is the most surprising thing here.

3 : Anonymous2022/02/02 17:26 ID: hvauako

TL;DW:

Without question, the game looks great on all 3 machines.

Quality mode on both PS5 and XSX is 1080p with ray-traced shadows/torchlights/ambient occlusion. The ray-tracing has a huge impact on the look of the game, especially outdoor areas. This mode is a locked 30fps with perfect frame-pacing and no issues based on the first 3 hours on both consoles.

Resolution mode is 1800p30 on PS5 and 1944p30 on XSX. Tom says the resolution difference isn't very noticeable when comparing side-by-side. This is the only mode on PS5/XSX where he experienced some very brief drops. 99.9% of the time it's perfect though.

Performance mode is 1080p at a perfect 60fps on both PS5 and XSX.

Curiously, in these latter two non-rt modes, PS5 and XSX render shadows differently. Often trees on PS5 are fully shaded, while the Series X|S leave the trees lighter with less shade.

Series S has one mode which is 1080p. Core visual features like animation, texture quality and lighting are the same as on PS5/XSX, but there's no RT option. This mode is a solid 30fps with few issues.

ID: hvavskf

1800p? Where's 4k?

ID: hvaxonk

Forget that, why is the performance mode only 1080p?

ID: hvb1njb

This is the requirement for 4K 60fps

ID: hvaw8dt

Yeah, that’s a let down

ID: hvb2wir

TECHland not very techsavvy

ID: hvbc4jf

wtf Performance mode is 1080p ? wtf are they Polish studio doing...

4 : Anonymous2022/02/02 19:43 ID: hvbghap

Sounds fine to me but I use a PC monitor and 1080p looks great still. I guess it's pretty lame for people on big 4k tvs, though.

5 : Anonymous2022/02/02 18:17 ID: hvb2nd3

1080p60 and 1800p30? The fuck? That’s like some Ps4 Pro type shit.

ID: hvb6m93

I'm really curious how it is on last gen.

Ps4 - 900p/30fps?

Ps4 Pro - 1200p/30fps?

It may also be super optimized for last gen, leaving the new console to run it so poorly.

ID: hvb3n1x

Yep, it's really disappoiting. If that'll be the case for future games, i might as well buy low-mid end pc that also runs games 1080/60...

ID: hvbyi3k

Yep, I’ll pass on this just like guardians of the galaxy.

ID: hvc4nfa

Guardians looked incredible in Performance mode though. Raw pixel count means nothing these days.

6 : Anonymous2022/02/02 17:36 ID: hvavw8l

So tired of games running at 1080p. It's like we going backwards

ID: hvazccb

Rather have 60fps than 1080p tbh.

ID: hvb4fi9

1080 60 should be the minimum rather than the choice.

The choice should be 4k OR 60 fps.

ID: hvb6tbu

I honestly expected 1080p/120fps, not half the performance lmao

7 : Anonymous2022/02/02 21:19 ID: hvbvz9o

Are we really that surprised this game can’t hit 4k 60fps? The devs said they’d release a patch for DL1 for next gen consoles to hit that mark and they still haven’t delivered.

8 : Anonymous2022/02/02 17:42 ID: hvawv7k

1080p/30fps? That raytracing better be god damn amazing

ID: hvb41pg

It looks nice, but no RTGI or reflections

9 : Anonymous2022/02/02 17:37 ID: hvaw3ut

Another banger from Digital Foundry

10 : Anonymous2022/02/02 17:52 ID: hvayjmt

Damn this is a heavy game. 1080p30fps? That's worse than the Matrix UE5 demo

11 : Anonymous2022/02/02 20:06 ID: hvbk0xy

60 FPS should be 1440P, not 1080!

12 : Anonymous2022/02/02 18:19 ID: hvb2x5j

Guess I’ll get it on PC If I even get it at all.

All focus on GT7/Horizon now!

ID: hvc0tpj

I’ll get it on PC when my girl who’s very fit gives it to me.

13 : Anonymous2022/02/02 19:05 ID: hvbaeyh

Are these specs going to change with a day 1 patch?

ID: hvbn1ys

It better only doing 1800p 30 is bad knowing the ps4 pro is doing dynamic 1440p 30

14 : Anonymous2022/02/02 20:17 ID: hvblu5s

bruh moment

15 : Anonymous2022/02/02 20:18 ID: hvblvho

Ok buying for pc then.

16 : Anonymous2022/02/02 21:15 ID: hvbvbec

So, P5 performance mode would be best for someone who doesn't care about shadow cast by grass?

17 : Anonymous2022/02/02 21:17 ID: hvbvnzd

[deleted]

ID: hvbwc4z

1800p*

18 : Anonymous2022/02/02 21:31 ID: hvby14e

What’s curious to me: how on earth are they planning to port this to the Switch? If XSX and PS5 can run it more than 1800/1933p at 30fps, what makes them the switch will come close to that? Are we looking at something like 480p-720p & 30 fps on the Switch?

19 : Anonymous2022/02/02 21:33 ID: hvbyesl

Glad I've got a PC with a 3080FE. I love my PS5 but no game should be played at 1080p ever in 2022.

20 : Anonymous2022/02/02 22:34 ID: hvc8618

If it doesn't even run like most games now then why the fuck is there even a ps5 version of the game? Might as well keep it as a ps4 title and then make a purely dedicated version of the game that runs in 4k60

ID: hvccvfx

These new consoles are way too weak for 4k60 AAA games.

21 : Anonymous2022/02/02 18:02 ID: hvb08y2

Whenever I see strange and even bad performance modes like these I always think of the magic that Metro Exodus achieved. This looks like the devs struggled with performance mode and didn't bother to drop the resolution to around 1440p to hopefully bring up the performance.

ID: hvbdjda

Metro exodus dipped below 1080p on the ps5 lol

ID: hvbr6w1

That was with RT & 60fps tho. This is 1080p/30

22 : Anonymous2022/02/02 19:21 ID: hvbd287

1080p 60 fps is unacceptable in 2022. I will not be buying this now. 1080p looks awful compared to 1440p and 4K.

ID: hvc0kne

Agree. This is so fucking pathetic.

23 : Anonymous2022/02/02 19:00 ID: hvb9ody

None of the modes appeal to me at all. I can't go back to 30fps. And the 60fps mode is 1080p, which is the same resolution as the first game from 7 years ago. Guardians of the galaxy had similar graphic modes, and it did actually put me off buying it. I hope this standard doesn't become the norm.

24 : Anonymous2022/02/02 19:52 ID: hvbhu7s

Seems like a poorly optimized engine to me. If I had to guess its was designed around PC then ported to consoles and just use their brute power to render the game. My reasoning is that on paper Xbox is 13%-18% better gpu and that's exactly what we get with the resolution increase to XSX. It doesn't seem like they did any smart coding to get better visuals. But its great that its all runs perfectly.

25 : Anonymous2022/02/02 20:17 ID: hvbltmf

After seeing Guardians of the Galaxy in 1080P 60 I think I'm just going to skip this completely until they decide to start using these machines for real. I had to play Guardians in 4k 30 because the 1080p is a joke. I can only imagine it's the same thing here.

ID: hvbmtz5

You really got bent out of shape over 1080p? I played the GOTG on performance mode and had a wonderful time and thought it looked amazing.

ID: hvbo0rf

Oh when you're playing is fantastic I'm not going to say that it's not better to play in 60fps Guardians of the Galaxy just didn't have enough fast-paced gameplay for it to be worth it to drop to a quarter of the resolution. It makes a huge difference especially if you have a big TV

26 : Anonymous2022/02/02 17:44 ID: hvaxban

Yikes, neither console runs it at 4k30. I expected a 1440p 60fps or 1440p 30fps with ray tracing but this is kinda dissapointing.

27 : Anonymous2022/02/02 18:02 ID: hvb08dn

Didn't they say they would stop Pixel counting this year?

28 : Anonymous2022/02/02 21:15 ID: hvbv9q3

It sucks to see this post get downvoted, it made me decide to skip launch and save my money until they update it sometime down the line or when its half off, but more people should see this video, these modes are really not acceptable.

引用元:https://www.reddit.com/r/PS5/comments/siu4wr/dying_light_2_stay_human_ps5_vs_xbox_series_xs/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x