- It's a tough choice
-
Both reviews should be ignored. Find ones that tell you why it's good or why it's bad. I have a feeling you know this though and are just shit posting
ID: hq61ldsID: hq6ig1vThat seems like it would naturally lead to a positive bias. For most reasons that I'd dislike a game I'd stop playing it within a few hours. The remaining negative reviews at 100 hours are mostly people complaining about some recent change in the game (which is fair) or people who didn't feel like they got enough cOnTeNt out of the 100 hours of entertainment they spent lunch money on.
ID: hq6lhdmIsn't calling some steam reviews good and some bad splitting hairs? Like only getting rid of the cancer you don't like? It's like "which basement lord incel do YOU trust!"
ID: hq79u9aI think it's more of a case that these sorts of reviews don't give any real data to inform whether this game is worth trying or not.
For example, someone saying "This game is filled with microtransactions and predatory practices that try to keep you playing so they can drain your wallet" is far more helpful than a simple "This game is bad, I don't like it".
ID: hq6urbuOnly pro-user reviews allowed in this thread apparently.
-
The duality of man.
-
beautiful
-
it's kinda obvious what this means, the game gets good somewhere between 7 and 11 hours in.
ID: hq7h9j0Actually just the half hour past 6.6 hours
-
Yawn shitpost
-
It's almost as if different people have different opinions.
-
Ignore all user reviews. Find journalists/streamers/YouTubers/whoever with a track record of liking what you like and listen to them.
-
You have to find out, so you can angle your own thumb accordingly. Best of luck!
-
It's possible to like bad things. Look at the movie The Room.
-
It's that 7th hour mark where the game really takes off!
引用元:https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/rps5uv/its_a_tough_choice/
I typically try to only read reviews from people with a substantial amount of hours.