‘Allen v. Farrow’ Team on Doc’s “Eye-Opening” Revisiting of Woody Allen, Mia Farrow Custody Case and Investigations

1 : Anonymous2021/03/08 03:47 ID: m071r2
'Allen v. Farrow' Team on Doc's "Eye-Opening" Revisiting of Woody Allen, Mia Farrow Custody Case and Investigations
2 : Anonymous2021/03/08 03:51 ID: gq6bbd3

No mention of Moses Farrow’s detailed arguments against the allegations?

ID: gq6fx2e

I’m sure it’s coming in the next episode since it hasn’t happened chronologically yet.

ID: gq6n4mm

Yeah they mentioned it at the end of episode 2 I believe it was. So far I think they've just detailed the story in chronological order, interviewing those who were closest to the story and willing to be interviewed.

ID: gq6ktid

Lots of mention of the numerous organizations and child abuse experts who at the time and not many years later agreed that Dylan was abused by Woody. Also lots of discussion about the court case where he lost his bid to take custody from Mia where the judge described Woody as having a disturbing relationship with Dylan and was only trying to make Mia look bad.

ID: gq6tcwr

People keep bringing up Moses, but as far as I'm concerned, that shouldn't negate Dylan's comments, or absolve Woody. Seems like you're asking us to believe one child over the other.

ID: gq6rms2

Ah good. So we believe Moses but Dylan and Satchel are untrustworthy. Good, good.

ID: gq78vqn

He refused to cooperate with this documentary.

Maybe you could come up with conspiracy that the filmmakers would not have included it, but note that Moses never subjected his arguments to journalistic scrutiny.

If Moses is not willing to go to any credible journalist, that is saying something.

3 : Anonymous2021/03/08 07:44 ID: gq6u0ji

I keep seeing people regretting that Woody Allen isn't giving his side of the story in this, but I think we've heard more than enough from him. He's publicly denied the allegations. We've seen the excerpts from his book, and heard his side of the story from the numerous recorded phone calls. We've heard the comments he made at the trial. I'm not sure what more could be said from him. At this point, you either believe Dylan, or you believe Woody Allen.

What's more, people have tried to painted Mia as being an abusive mother. But even if that's true, that doesn't mean Dylan was lying about being abused by Allen. All that means is she has two shitty parents instead of one.

4 : Anonymous2021/03/08 04:02 ID: gq6ce41

Both Woody and Mia are POS

ID: gq6jqt6

Feel the most bad for the victim here, Dylan.

Bottom line is that a child was molested and nothing was done about it.

ID: gq6roof

I can understand why you'd be paralyzed in a situation like that, but she does come across as so incredibly, pathetically weak. Even if I mentally correct for the strain that having your long time partner - a beloved cultural icon who you loved and shared a life with for years - turned out to be a pedophile who is abusing your children, I have a hard time believing that I would not have done better, and I'm sure you feel the same.

That being said, your post seems to imply that they're both bad, and that there is some kind of symmetry to their evils. There is not. Mia Farrow was simply a foolish woman faced with an impossible situation that she failed to manage. Woody Allen is a fucking monster.

引用元:https://www.reddit.com/r/television/comments/m071r2/allen_v_farrow_team_on_docs_eyeopening_revisiting/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x