I benchmarked every setting in 0.12 in an Optimization Guide

1 : Anonymous2021/12/14 16:52 ID: rgbpid
I benchmarked every setting in 0.12 in an Optimization Guide
2 : Anonymous2021/12/14 16:55 ID: hoj3rg9

Windows tips until 7:44.

Pre-Optimization Benchmark until 8:44.

The rest of the video is me benchmarking the effect of every setting in .12.

While it's not a super detailed video graphs, it should give you a good idea of what does what.

ID: hojl8wv

TLDW (Setting {before} -> {after} = {before FPS} -> {after FPS}):

- Object LOD: 4 -> 2 == 32 -> 33 FPS

- Overall visibility: 3000 -> 400 == 33 -> 34 FPS (1000 still 34FPS)

- Anti-aliasing: TAA High -> Off == 34 -> 35 FPS (Need AA? TAA.)

- Resampling: 1x (Rather use NIS -- Guide linked in description)

- HBAO: Colored very high -> off == 35 -> 43 FPS

- SSR: Ultra -> Off == 43 -> 80 FPS

- Anisotropic Filtering: On -> Off == 80 -> 87 FPS (Per texture = 82 FPS)

- Nvidia Reflex Low Latency: On -> Off == 87 -> 89 FPS (On+Boost = 84 FPS)

- Sharpness: No effect. (3 for stimulant effect kekw)

- Lobby FPS Limit: No effect. (duh)

- HighQualityColor: On -> Off == 87 -> 94 FPS (Didn't restart. After raid restart: 116 FPS [was now cloudy too])

-- Disabling PostFX entirely: 94 -> 100 FPS

-- FOV: Min FOV -> Max FOX: No change (may have difference on your system)

- Only use Physical Cores On -> Off: No change. (Ryzen 3900X though)

- Automatic RAM cleaner: Nothing (128GB RAM though)

- Texture Quality: No change, but didn't include in video.

- Shadow Quality: Ultra -> Medium -> Low: 100 -> 100 -> 103

1080 Ti has 11GB VRAM. These had no impact.

Use ~ then "fps 1", or "fps 2" and "fps 0" for graph on, more info and then off.

ID: hojt3al

Thank you for the TLDW, I much prefer a list like this to a lengthy video

ID: hojlw1c

Gave you a subscribe and a like, thank you.

ID: hok5a01

(128GB RAM though)

Subtle flex

ID: hojodqa

From my testing, if you want to use HBAO setting it to medium looks good without much performance impact.

ID: hokjktw

I will point out as a tip that changing texture quality to lower settings on a higher end card may actually lower overall FPS, as you are putting more strain on the CPU. Find the right setting for your card and system there.

ID: hojujui

Props for including your data like this.

ID: hok0y38

Give this man max trader rep....

ID: hok6h82

Hey did you try texture steaming?

ID: hojgatf

What's your setup?

ID: hojlyf5

Ryzen 3900X. Nvidia 1080 Ti. 128 GB 3600 MHz RAM. Samsung 960 EVO NVME SSD.

3 : Anonymous2021/12/14 16:59 ID: hoj4ci8

You dropped your crown king

4 : Anonymous2021/12/14 20:07 ID: hojxaab

Get terrible performance and my CPU/GPU is only ever 49% utilized. I hope this brings back playability as it seems to change every update.

5 : Anonymous2021/12/14 19:19 ID: hojpz4b

dude... you didnt have to but holy fuck this has earned you a subscribe. its the least i can do.

6 : Anonymous2021/12/14 18:22 ID: hojh6i9

Can someone please make a text-based optimization guide guide?

ID: hojp0hc

/comments/rgbpid/comment/hojlc8l/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3" class="reddit-press-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.reddit.com//comments/rgbpid/comment/hojlc8l/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

ID: hokhgny

TL;DW: Turn all your settings to low, except texture quality. Nothing new in this guide, you could watch one from 2019 and get the same results.

ID: hoko3av

This guide had some windows setting i hadnt seen before like Hardware accelerated gpu scheduling, and I follow optimization guides like this for every game.

7 : Anonymous2021/12/14 19:10 ID: hojogjk

Changing 2600 to 5600x tomorrow really hope to be able play Shoreline normally 😀

ID: hok2wof

I recently did this upgrade, the 5600x completely murders the 2600. Enjoy it man.

8 : Anonymous2021/12/14 18:34 ID: hojj2vi

"Optimization" - everything set to "off", kekw.

ID: hojllcp

Pretty much most games imo. Some make no difference if your PC is above a certain spec nowadays too.

ID: hok12c7

Did you find any way to disable bloom & hdr like we use to be able to? Those use to give massive fps gains.

Example of old cfg:

ID: hojn1de

I understand your point of view because Tarkov is a CPU hog game, Unity engine is a piece of ****. CPU's with strong 1 core are blessed in this game, like for example top Intel CPU's or newest Ryzen's 5600X and above.

Overall if devs can't optimize Unity engine in this game to start utilize CPU's multithreading properly and more efficiently or simply CPU will not be offloaded in favor to GPU then nothing will change for the better.

Also "picture in picture" mode with weapons scopes is a very bad idea and creates huge fps drops - 10/20fps depending on the location.

9 : Anonymous2021/12/14 18:16 ID: hojg94e

Anybody have it in text format or a tl;dw?

ID: hojlnrf

Commented on the post a few times with TLDW

ID: hojm4je

Thanks!

ID: hojp12y

/comments/rgbpid/comment/hojlc8l/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3" class="reddit-press-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.reddit.com//comments/rgbpid/comment/hojlc8l/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

10 : Anonymous2021/12/14 17:54 ID: hojcz8n

Can we get a TLDR of this por favor?

ID: hojlbl5

TLDW (Setting {before} -> {after} = {before FPS} -> {after FPS}):

- Object LOD: 4 -> 2 == 32 -> 33 FPS

- Overall visibility: 3000 -> 400 == 33 -> 34 FPS (1000 still 34FPS)

- Anti-aliasing: TAA High -> Off == 34 -> 35 FPS (Need AA? TAA.)

- Resampling: 1x (Rather use NIS -- Guide linked in description)

- HBAO: Colored very high -> off == 35 -> 43 FPS

- SSR: Ultra -> Off == 43 -> 80 FPS

- Anisotropic Filtering: On -> Off == 80 -> 87 FPS (Per texture = 82 FPS)

- Nvidia Reflex Low Latency: On -> Off == 87 -> 89 FPS (On+Boost = 84 FPS)

- Sharpness: No effect. (3 for stimulant effect kekw)

- Lobby FPS Limit: No effect. (duh)

- HighQualityColor: On -> Off == 87 -> 94 FPS (Didn't restart. After raid restart: 116 FPS [was now cloudy too])

-- Disabling PostFX entirely: 94 -> 100 FPS

-- FOV: Min FOV -> Max FOX: No change (may have difference on your system)

- Only use Physical Cores On -> Off: No change. (Ryzen 3900X though)

- Automatic RAM cleaner: Nothing (128GB RAM though)

- Texture Quality: No change, but didn't include in video.

- Shadow Quality: Ultra -> Medium -> Low: 100 -> 100 -> 103

1080 Ti has 11GB VRAM. These had no impact.

Use ~ then "fps 1", or "fps 2" and "fps 0" for graph on, more info and then off.

ID: hojxgbb

thank you, you're awesome

11 : Anonymous2021/12/14 22:03 ID: hokek63

Do you have any evidence to show changing the graphics setting in Windows does anything? I feel like these options are so often a placebo which either do nothing or actually decrease performance. For example, in your nvidia optimisation guide (I knew I'd find it because everyone recommends it), changing the power mode to "max performance" will at most do nothing or just throw more watts at the GPU, which ironically only increases the temps which decreases core clock. The GPU knows how to schedule itself, it isn't hiding performance for no reason, so changing that setting is counter productive.

I'm not sure that the settings in the compatibility tab for the games executable do anything either. It seems to be just hearsay that gamers assume to be true because everyone else does it.

12 : Anonymous2021/12/14 22:41 ID: hokjwvd

Couple thoughts on this:

High DPI settings don't do a single thing if you aren't using non-100% DPI and even then is basically free performance wise because it mostly is changing how fonts and UI elements are rendered, this is simply placebo. Hardware Accelerated GPU scheduling can have problems on some PC configurations (mainly with older Nvidia GPUs) so I'd suggest you give people a note that it can have negative effects, I'd also be curious about effects on this If you disable fullscreen optimization the literally only thing it does is disable any and all overlays that Windows has (Spotify for example when you press next song). A great read about this:

Lastly, I did a couple benchmarks when I was upgrading from a 3700X to a 5900X and noticed that the improvements in offline mode were rather small compared to actually playing the game online.

The network/overhead when playing online is immense so while it's great that your guide does offline comparisons, a lot of players will run into a CPU bottleneck playing online while having a GPU bottleneck playing offline.

Correct me if I'm wrong but you would have to basically test each setting twice, once with a CPU bottle neck at say 480p or so and once with a GPU bottle neck at 1440p like you did.

13 : Anonymous2021/12/14 18:44 ID: hojkkga

Over 10 years ago reducing settings on games could sometimes make them worse as graphical loads were sent to the CPU instead, is there anyway to get Tarkov to use the GPU more? Mine sits at about 40-50% in Tarkov but 90-100% in pubg for example.

ID: hokgfs6

It doesn’t work that way. The cpu can not offload tasks onto the gpu. That kind of stuff is controlled by unity and how they develop the game. The game is very cpu heavy and unless they make optimizations there’s really not much you can do outside of turning down settings, and making sure your cpu runs as best as possible (cooling, over clocking etc)

ID: hojt7q7

i would love if someone could let me know too

ID: hojv16g

Maybe I'll do some fuckery tonight, see if I can figure it out.

ID: hojvdzz

Typically the higher gpu usage is related to higher resolution, render distances, Ray tracing, etc. I can't speak to pubg as I haven't played in a long long time but tarkov has always been very cpu bound. What chip and gpu do you have? You could be getting a bottleneck from your cpu.

I've got a 3080 and a 5900x and my gpu sits around 90-100 almost all the time

14 : Anonymous2021/12/14 20:27 ID: hok0ch2

It would be a great guide if the testing was done properly. Because this is hardly optimization, although windows tips were great (no disinformation unlike lots of other videos). Imo, the correct way to test performance with cpu strain is applied is to load as a scav for each setting, meaning: scav in and stand still -> record fps -> alt+f4 -> change the setting -> reload into the raid. That way you can see more or less consistently how settings affect performance while being in online raid, since scavs load later into the raid and see what frames you are realistically getting in-game. There is more or less not much going on on the server which makes it even more consistent in terms of performance. I was too lazy to test every settings, but some settings like textures or shadows or mip streaming didn't change my frames what so ever. Lod distance on the other hand has a significant performance impact when you're playing online, so unless you absolutely need it for sniping, I would always keep it at 400.

9700 + 2080 @ fhd, which proves once again, that pretty much everyone in tarkov is cpu bottlenecked + poor thread usage doesn't help while playing online. That's why you see majority of people with more or less modern pc's are having same frames and that's why certain cpu's like ryzens struggle with tarkov. So most helpful points in your guide could actually be windows part, because that can actually help with lowering cpu usage while playing. For example when I load my obs with bunch of scenes, even without streaming it shows about 3-6% cpu load and that load alone would cause about 5-10 fps drop while testing. Basically if you want better performance for tarkov make sure to close everything you possibly can + overclocking should definitely help.

15 : Anonymous2021/12/14 19:22 ID: hojqc09

Keep in mind that only certain post FX settings impact your framerate. Simple brightness and vibrance tweaks have zero impact while stuff like adaptive sharpening and clarity will severely hinder performance.

16 : Anonymous2021/12/14 20:33 ID: hok1a0h

We have these videos every single wipe and after two weeks some man with a phd in unity game design shows up to explain that virtually all aspects of those videos are clickbaity garbage and all performance increases are anecdotal at best from a restart of the client. Let's just skip the shitflinging for like one wipe, please.

There absolutely isn't some toggle in the options, some nvidia control panel change, or some bios adjustment that you can make that suddenly make tarkov run perfectly. This is the grim terrible truth that nobody likes to hear. At the end of the day we just have to wait.

17 : Anonymous2021/12/14 19:35 ID: hojsf1j

2022 optimization guide

Didn't realize patches were like cars

ID: hojz44a

The all new 2022 Nissan Optimization.

18 : Anonymous2021/12/14 18:29 ID: hoji922

Imagine calling it 60 -> 144FPS when its more like 35 -> 93 FPS and then you do your first online run and it becomes 35 -> 60 FPS.

ID: hojm8o0

you do realize that going from 35 to 93 is an even better improvement than 60 to 144 right?

ID: hojng84

Unplayable to better than you really need vs. Where you should be to better than you really need

(I'm spelling it out for them)

ID: hoju0sh

And you do realize that calling a Video BEST Optimization Guide | Max FPS - 60 -> 144FPS while only getting up to 93 FPS in "HIS" Offline Raid is just clickbait. The second he plays a Online Raid his FPS will not even come close to any of his FPS in the "benchmark"

Plus; going back to the video title, Nvidia/AMD Control Panel, Windows GameMode, Powerplan options, XMP for your RAM, Disable ULPS for AMD and much more "Optimizations" arent even talked about in the Video titled BEST Optimization Guide blabla. But those DO increase FPS in most cases by a lot.

19 : Anonymous2021/12/14 18:24 ID: hojhis3

I'm just commenting for a TL;DW

ID: hojlc8l

TLDW (Setting {before} -> {after} = {before FPS} -> {after FPS}):

- Object LOD: 4 -> 2 == 32 -> 33 FPS

- Overall visibility: 3000 -> 400 == 33 -> 34 FPS (1000 still 34FPS)

- Anti-aliasing: TAA High -> Off == 34 -> 35 FPS (Need AA? TAA.)

- Resampling: 1x (Rather use NIS -- Guide linked in description)

- HBAO: Colored very high -> off == 35 -> 43 FPS

- SSR: Ultra -> Off == 43 -> 80 FPS

- Anisotropic Filtering: On -> Off == 80 -> 87 FPS (Per texture = 82 FPS)

- Nvidia Reflex Low Latency: On -> Off == 87 -> 89 FPS (On+Boost = 84 FPS)

- Sharpness: No effect. (3 for stimulant effect kekw)

- Lobby FPS Limit: No effect. (duh)

- HighQualityColor: On -> Off == 87 -> 94 FPS (Didn't restart. After raid restart: 116 FPS [was now cloudy too])

-- Disabling PostFX entirely: 94 -> 100 FPS

-- FOV: Min FOV -> Max FOX: No change (may have difference on your system)

- Only use Physical Cores On -> Off: No change. (Ryzen 3900X though)

- Automatic RAM cleaner: Nothing (128GB RAM though)

- Texture Quality: No change, but didn't include in video.

- Shadow Quality: Ultra -> Medium -> Low: 100 -> 100 -> 103

1080 Ti has 11GB VRAM. These had no impact.

Use ~ then "fps 1", or "fps 2" and "fps 0" for graph on, more info and then off.

引用元:https://www.reddit.com/r/EscapefromTarkov/comments/rgbpid/i_benchmarked_every_setting_in_012_in_an/

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x