-
For 60 bucks, I was expecting something like this. That's what we deserved.
-
Business rule- never give more if customer accepts less.
ID: hkhedlrID: hkhsg5qRule 39: don't tell customers more than they need to know
Rule 87: Learn the customer's weaknesses so you can better take advantage of them
ID: hkhp5l5customer picks up a chancla "Are you sure about that?"
ID: hkhpq4qRule of Acquisition 112: “Never have sex with the boss' sister.”
ID: hkhqg0cFail in this case. Instead, they earned the stigma of having produced a meme-factory of a product. It's sort of like how everyone is going to be veeery cautious about the next Bethesda Fallout. Business folly: There are limits to how far you can ride on your reputation.
ID: hkhwo70People say that about every triple a studio yet they keep buying their shit
ID: hkhu3unpeople have been saying that about EA for how long now?
ID: hkhxupcIt's sort of like how everyone is going to be veeery cautious about the next Bethesda Fallout
No they wont. They will say "It's my money, none of your business if I pre order or not. I was going to buy it anyway."
ID: hkhug56CD Projekt Red as well
-
Why would you give yourself such high expectations.
As a long time Red Dead Online player, they've been disappointing me for years.
ID: hkhir4wMan I remember the days of us hyping up any new update just to get mediocre clothes and discounts
ID: hkhj41j... Are those days passed..?
ID: hkhngknOh god, you just gave me flashbacks to the infamous "summer update" wait, where we went like half a year with no new content in the game, then they promised a huge update during summer and everyone went mental.
Rockstar then released the update on THE very last day of summer when most people were back at college/uni/work, completely pissing off the entire fanbase.
Ahh the good old days, at least we had hope then.
ID: hkhh637As another person who played since day 1 of the red dead online beta, I agree. Rockstar games has a solid history of railing their fans up the butt, it's just the GTA fandom never saw it like we did lol.
Welcome, GTA brothers and sisters, now you know how it feels.
-Sincerely, a Red dead player
ID: hkho6wvGamers will never, ever learn.
ID: hkho83xStory mode is a fucking masterpiece, though.
ID: hkhp451Stop playing the online versions of their games and maybe they will invest more into the single player versions?
ID: hkhr2leThat ship sailed my man and it’s never coming back. They tapped into a market that was infinitely more lucrative than just single player games and they will die before going back.
-
That’d be a full out remake at that point
ID: hkhpkw7Can’t even tell if OP is serious or not. I sure hope not.
I was expecting them to look like GTA V which is 10 years old at this point, and at the time was developed for hardware that was already around 3-5 years old. I would’ve been fine with them looking like ~12 year old games and running like new. Instead they look like 20+ year old games and run like 20+ year old games. Which is laughable and embarrassing.
ID: hkhptsmWell actually the originals play & look better in a lot of areas. This version is based off the mobile phone port, and has MORE bugs than the original release. It's so bad.
ID: hkhsubfThat would be a remake as well. Remaster means you take what you have and make the graphics slightly better and in 1080p or 4k resolution and 30-60fps if the original had less than that. And if possible make the controls better.
They made 2 of 3 of these things. Look at all other remasters. No remaster ever jumps much in graphics/art design. Because you take what you have and update it a little.
It's also in movies and music as well. If you want a James Bond Golden Eye remaster. They don't reshoot the whole film but update the visuals and sounds if they have the raw material. Music remasters aren't re recorded. They just take the raw files and make a new master "remaster" if it was re recorded then it would be called re recorded.
Hate it or leave it. The janky controls are the same janky controls as the original San Andreas because it is the same base game with slightly better optics.
If you have to remodel everything from the ground to meet GTA 5 standards then you have already a remake. Because they re-make the whole thing.
ID: hkhrkt7People still dont know the difference between remaster and remake
ID: hkhqx8jalso that would be 60 bucks for each game of the trilogy and not 60 for 3 games.
-
Nobody expected this lol
ID: hkhxaodWait this isn’t a parody post?
ID: hki1stpliterally "NINTENDO HIRE THIS MAN" bullshit being posted
ID: hkhh3lgSeriously, these delusional, karma-whoring posts are getting on my nerves. There are definitely legitimate complaints about the remastered trilogy (cartoonish art style, lack of fog, performance issues, etc). But anyone expecting a FF7 remake level of work for all 3 full games are insane. Especially for $60…
ID: hkhkcrdJust popping in to say that as a game dev, these posts are giving me an aneurysm.
Yes rockstar truly, truly underdelivered and there was some serious lack of testing, but some of these posts are absurd.
ID: hkhxum3Just saw a post labelling people who say “your expectations were too high” as rockstar bootlickers lmao. Not sure why people were thinking it’s realistic of a remaster to be either GTA V or nextgen level remakes
-
That would take 10 more years
ID: hkhoahmYes and much more money
-
You must not know the difference between a remaster and a remake then
-
You act like they didn’t show you what cj looked like before purchasing.
-
Lol. Manage your expectations a bit better.
ID: hkhm3ywor literally watch any of the trailers before you buy the game. At no point did rockstar indicate the game would look anything like the right image.
ID: hki85eayeah this is literally someone seeing an artist rendition doing some stuff for fun and going "OMG THE GAME IS GONNA LOOK LIKE THIS"
cmon now people get some media literacy
-
Lmao it's a remaster of a ps2 game. Why the fuck would you expect that? It's not a remake
-
Not to defend what they put out, but I hope you didn't seriously expect that. They mentioned when it was revealed that they weren't changing the art direction.
-
That's a remake. Entirely new asset. Remaster is an updated or altered version of the original.
Should a remaster cost $60? Probably not. Should you have bought it sight unseen? Probably not.
Edit: also it's $60 for three remastered games.
-
“Deserved”...jeez.
-
Do you know what remaster means?
-
Gta 5 doesn't even have that haha. Your expectation and demands are way too high for something they just released for a quick few bucks in order to calm the gta6 crowd and delay it more.
-
Lol you're fucking delusional. How does this shit get upvotes
ID: hki6ki3From other delusional people
-
it's incredible how self righteous yall can get about video games
ID: hkhz2bn$60 for 3 games total made almost 20 years ago each and you'd think people were expecting gta 5 levels of everythin
-
Deserved ..? I get that some people aren’t perfectly happy with the remaster, but it’s a product… not something you’re entitled to.. that 60$ isn’t ripped off of your account, it’s a price you pay if you want, that’s it. We don’t « deserve » perfect games like we imagine, we get them or we don’t. They don’t owe you anything
ID: hkhqeqzThere's also the option to wait until it comes down in price, but some people apparently can't wait for that. I'm not buying it until it gets to $30 or less. Nowadays games don't even take very long to drop significantly and by then they'll likely have fixed some things.
引用元:https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/qt6dbz/for_60_bucks_i_was_expecting_something_like_this/
"You can't cheat an honest customer, but it never hurts to try."
-Ferengi Rules Of Acquisition